{"id":4073,"date":"2021-04-12T09:15:12","date_gmt":"2021-04-12T09:15:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress-195849-4032129.cloudwaysapps.com\/michigan-drivers-license-restoration-lawyers-the-winning-questions\/"},"modified":"2024-02-19T18:54:02","modified_gmt":"2024-02-19T23:54:02","slug":"michigan-drivers-license-restoration-lawyers-ask-the-winning-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/blog\/michigan-drivers-license-restoration-lawyers-ask-the-winning-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Michigan Driver’s License Restoration Lawyers – The Winning Questions"},"content":{"rendered":"
As a Michigan driver\u2019s license restoration law firm that guarantees to win every restoration and clearance appeal case we take, my team and I have to ask each and every potential client some tough questions as part of our initial screening. Because the key goal of every license appeal is proving that a person has given up alcohol (and drugs) for good, we must ask any potential client some very direct questions about his or her relationship to alcohol, and specifically, when he or she last consumed any.<\/p>\n
Make no mistake, our firm is in business to make money. We get no pleasure from turning away people who are ready to pay our fees. However, our guarantee means that when we take on a driver’s license restoration or clearance appeal, we are obligated to stick with it until our client does win, and the last thing we want to do is hitch ourselves to some case that cannot succeed. If we did that, then we’d wind up eating a loss and then getting stuck having to do the whole case all over again the following year – for free.<\/p>\n
The simple truth is that we earn our livings winning these cases the first time around. Although we seldom lose a restoration or clearance appeal, on the very few occasions that we haven\u2019t won the first time, we have never hesitated to honor our guarantee. Nevertheless, our whole screening process is designed to make sure we don\u2019t wind up taking on a case that cannot or is otherwise not yet ready to win. This helps prevent us from having to do everything a second time, at our expense, as \u201cwarranty work.\u201d<\/p>\n
The reason why this matters will make more sense if we first clarify a few basic things about Michigan\u2019s DUI laws<\/a>:<\/p>\n As the reader no doubt knows from first-hand experience, racking up 2 DUI\u2019s within 7 years or 3 within 10 years results in the automatic revocation of his or her license.<\/p>\n What he or she may not know, however, is that when either of those things happen, a person is legally categorized as a \u201chabitual alcohol offender<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n This is important, because once a person is categorized as a habitual alcohol offender, he or she is also presumed<\/em>\u00a0to have an alcohol problem.<\/p>\n Some people get upset because they take this to mean that the state \u201cthinks\u201d they\u2019re an alcoholic; that\u2019s not what we\u2019re talking about here.<\/p>\n Although any person categorized as a habitual alcohol offender is presumed to have some kind<\/em> of risky and\/or troubled relationship to alcohol, the presumption itself does not define either its nature or extent of that.<\/p>\n Instead, it simply means that any person who has lost his or her license for multiple DUI\u2019s<\/a> has established him or her self to be a potential hazard when it comes to drinking (and driving).<\/p>\n This ties directly into the rules<\/a> governing license restoration and clearance cases<\/a>. In order to win<\/a> a Michigan license appeal, a person must prove at least the following 2 things, by what the law specifies as clear and convincing evidence<\/em>:<\/p>\n First<\/u><\/strong>, that his or her alcohol problem is \u201cunder control,\u201d meaning that he or she has been completely alcohol-free for a legally sufficient period of time (in our office, we won\u2019t even consider filing a case until a person has been abstinent from alcohol for at least 18 months), and<\/p>\n Second<\/u><\/strong>, that the person\u2019s alcohol problem is \u201clikely to remain under control.\u201d This requires demonstrating both the ability and commitment to remain alcohol-free. Put another way, this requires that the person prove him or her self to be a safe bet to never drink again<\/em>.<\/p>\n The simplest way to look at this is that the Secretary of State (correctly) interprets the law as making clear that the ONLY people who can win a license appeal are those who can prove these 3 things:<\/p>\n 1. That they have quit drinking, <\/strong> And to be clear, the whole abstinence thing includes marijuana<\/a>. Under no circumstances whatsoever can a person who uses recreational marijuana<\/a> – no matter how infrequently – win a license appeal. It\u2019s even hard to win with a medical marijuana<\/a> card, but that\u2019s another subject in its own right, and the reader can click any of the linked articles to learn more.<\/p>\n Every day, our office gets loads of emails and phone calls from people who have found us online, seen the sheer volume of information I have put up, see our guarantee<\/a> to win every driver’s license restoration and clearance appeal<\/a> case we accept, and are ready to hire us on the spot.<\/p>\n They usually start out by telling us things like:<\/p>\n I don\u2019t want to seem callous, but we\u2019ve heard these things before – a million times over. We know how much it sucks to be unable to drive. Unfortunately, absolutely none<\/strong> of it matters in the context of a license appeal.<\/p>\n Remember,\u00a0 we\u2019re in business to make money. There is no profit to be made by turning away someone who stands ready to hire us.<\/p>\n However, my team and I have certain standards, and the very first of them is to do the right thing.<\/p>\n Even if we didn\u2019t have our guarantee<\/a> in place, it would just be plain WRONG to take someone\u2019s money and file a license appeal that can\u2019t win.<\/p>\n Frankly, I\u2019d be embarrassed to do that. It takes a lifetime to build and maintain a good reputation, but it only takes one stupid thing to call it into question. I would NEVER want the hearing officers from the Michigan Secretary of State<\/a> to think that our office took a case just to get paid.<\/p>\n Our integrity is not for sale.<\/p>\n Yet for all the self-praise I could heap upon my team and myself<\/a>, the simple fact is that our guarantee stands as a firm safeguard, because as much as it protects the client from risking his or her money on a license appeal that can\u2019t win, it also prevents us from ever being tempted to take any such case in the first place, lest we get stuck with a losing matter that will obligate us to do \u201cwarranty work.\u201d<\/p>\n This brings us back to why we need to be tough<\/a> in our screenings. Ann, our senior assistant, likes to say that if you think we\u2019re<\/em>\u00a0being tough, how do you expect to get though the license appeal process with the Secretary of State?<\/p>\n
\n2. That they have been abstinent from alcohol for that \u201clegally sufficient\u201d period of time, and,<\/strong>
\n3. That have the commitment and tools to never drink again.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n