Admittedly, it can be confusing and a bit difficult to keep track of and understand the differences between all the terms used to describe a Michigan drunk driving charge.<\/p>\n
The most common term is \u201cDUI,\u201d yet Michigan does not have, and has never had a law that actually uses those letters.\u00a0<\/p>\n
For many years, the formal term for drunk driving, under Michigan law, was \u201cOUIL,\u201d which meant \u201cOperating Under the Influence of Liquor.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n
The legal BAC (meaning bodily alcohol content, and usually understood as either breath-test or blood-test result) standard under that now obsolete OUIL law for drunk driving was .10.<\/p>\n
Under threat from the Federal Government to change the legal standard for drunk driving from .10 to .08, or else lose federal highway funds, Michigan\u2019s legislature then enacted a new set of laws in 2003, dropping the standard for drunk driving from .10 to .08, and changing the name of the offense from \u201cOperating Under the Influence of Liquor\u201d (OUIL) to \u201cOperating While Intoxicated<\/a>\u201d (OWI).<\/p>\n \u201cDUI\u201d is by far the most common term used in the United States, but there are a few others, as well, including:\u00a0<\/p>\n In addition, one might see the term “OUID,” meaning “Operating Under the Influence of Drugs,” although the OWI law includes driving while intoxicated by any substance. Accordingly, “OUID” is a misnomer, and driving while under the influence of drugs is covered under the OWI statute.<\/p>\n Beyond all that, Michigan has always had a lesser offense<\/em>\u00a0covering what\u2019s known as \u201cimpaired driving.\u201d\u00a0 As used in Michigan, Impaired Driving is supposed to mean something less than outright drunk or intoxicated<\/p>\n When the OUIL laws were in effect, the legal standard for \u201cimpaired driving\u201d was .07 (actually, .07 up to .10).<\/p>\n When the state legislature changed the drunk driving laws from OUIL to OWI, and the BAC standard for drunk driving changed from .10 to .08, the numerical BAC standard for impaired driving was eliminated, but not the offense itself.\u00a0<\/p>\n This means a person can be convicted of “Impaired Driving” with a BAC below .07, or if he or she is found to have been “visibly impaired” by the ingestion of any substance.<\/p>\n This means that the \u201cimpaired\u201d charge still exists, and is primarily used in plea bargains to reduce OWI or High BAC charges.<\/p>\n The bottom line is that almost everyone charged with a drunk driving offense in Michigan is facing an \u201cOWI\u201d charge.\u00a0<\/p>\n Yet for all of this discussion, almost every one of those people will begin <\/a>looking for a lawyer to <\/a>help them by searching for the term \u201cDUI.\u201d<\/p>\n Accordingly, we use the term “DUI” in the same sense it’s used by everyone else.<\/p>\n Admittedly, it can be confusing and a bit difficult to keep track of and understand the differences between all the terms used to describe a Michigan drunk driving charge. The most common term is \u201cDUI,\u201d yet Michigan does not have, and has never had a law that actually uses those letters.\u00a0 For many years, the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":7024,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-dui"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6143"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8244,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6143\/revisions\/8244"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7024"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"